Compliance Blog
    

Do the Right Thing: Self-Report Potential FCPA Violations

A recent bribery case is a reminder of the importance of robust anti-corruption and FCPA compliance training to U.S. companies with foreign subsidiaries. Last week, Rockwell Automation, Inc., a manufacturer of industrial automation products, settled an enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) alleging violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). The SEC had alleged that in 2003, a former subsidiary of Rockwell made over $1 million in payments to Chinese state-owned "design institutes" for the purpose of influencing contracts, and then inaccurately recorded these payments as "cost of sales."

 
Rockwell discovered the payments in 2006, during a normal internal review that was part of its corporate compliance and internal controls program. Rockwell investigated the payments, took several remedial actions and self-reported to both the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice. Under the terms of its settlement with the SEC, Rockwell agreed to disgorge about $1.7 million in net profit allegedly associated with the payments, as well as $590,000 in interest and a civil penalty of $400,000.
 
While the SEC pursued its case against Rockwell to the end, it's notable that the Justice Department did not file charges of its own. More commonly, both agencies pursue parallel FCPA actions against a potential violator based on the same set of facts — or neither one does.
 
The case sends at least two important signals about FCPA violations:
 
  • Good internal controls are critical. Ideally, internal reviews and audits will reveal accurate and transparent company records instead of erroneous or fraudulent ones. But the fact that Rockwell caught the potentially corrupt payments in the course of performing its normal internal review signaled that its internal-controls program was working properly.
  • Self-reporting of potential violations may lead to smaller penalties. Rockwell's self-reporting of the violations it discovered, coupled with the relatively modest nature of those violations, may have convinced the Justice Department to drop the case. And it likely kept the civil penalty in check in the SEC action — the $400,000 penalty was modest in the current FCPA enforcement environment. 
Categories: International Compliance
Tags: fcpa, Global anti-Corruption

ACC Alliance PartnerProskauerWhite & Case